Skip to content
Pablo Yanguas

Pablo Yanguas

Anti-corruption / Political economy of reform / Strategy and learning

  • About me
  • Publications
  • Book: Why We Lie About Aid
  • Media
  • Blog – Adaptive Development
  • Blog – Political Analysis
  • Blog – GeekDev Analogies
  • Twitter
  • Contact

Recent Posts

  • New paper! Adapting to fragility: Lessons from practitioners
  • STAAC Learning Papers
  • Welcome!
  • Building an adaptive anti-corruption programme: Lessons from STAAC Ghana
  • PEA Confessions, part IV: Of floors and ceilings
  • Debate: Should the West stop giving aid to Africa?
  • PEA Confessions, part III: More tools, please and thank you
  • Is your development agency Conan or Saruman?
  • “Can We Do Aid Better?” Debate at UCL
  • Duncan Green’s rant is not wrong. But the blame does not lie only in academia

Tags

  • Adaptive development
  • AECID
  • China
  • Comparative politics
  • D&D
  • David Booth
  • DFID
  • Doing Development Differently
  • DSA2016
  • Equality
  • ESID
  • Ethics
  • Foreign aid
  • GDI
  • Ghana
  • Governance
  • Israel-Palestina
  • Mali
  • Marx Bros.
  • Merilee Grindle
  • Methodology
  • Monty Python
  • Nic van de Walle
  • ONU
  • PDIA
  • PEA
  • podcast
  • Policy analysis
  • Political economy analysis
  • Political settlements
  • Publications
  • Public sector reform
  • Reinventing the wheel
  • Research
  • Rwanda
  • STAAC
  • Star Wars
  • Teaching
  • Theory
  • Thinking and working politically
  • Uganda
  • Value-for-money
  • Weber
  • Why we lie about aid
  • World Bank

My take on politically-informed programming in aid

facebookShare on Facebook
TwitterTweet
Posted on 10 October 201423 April 2021Author PabloCategories Development, Political AnalysisTags ESID, Political economy analysis

Post navigation

Previous Previous post: Academia should forget artists and embrace artisans
Next Next post: The irony of inequality policy? A small elite diagnosing the plight of millions
Proudly powered by WordPress